Showing posts with label gun violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun violence. Show all posts

Friday, 30 May 2014

FILM REVIEW: A MILLION WAYS TO DIE IN THE WEST

Anna (Charlize Theron) and Albert (Seth McFarlane) in A Million Ways to Die in the West.

Gun damn our history

By Ed Rampell

Meanwhile, back at the ranch:
 
For those who enjoy genre spoofs and gross out humor, Seth MacFarlane’s A Million Ways to Die in the West serves up a heaping pile of humor with a million mirthful movie moments. Others who prefer their comedy to be cerebral and refined, rather than raucous, may wish to hang up their spurs and sit this dizzy dosey doe out. While those minus any sense of humor at all should just stay at the old homestead, instead.
 
Although your critic also enjoys the dry wit of a Cole Porter or Noel Coward lyric, he belongs in the former camp and laughed (what’s left of) his head off. Around 40 years ago, when Mel Brooks unleashed Blazing Saddles on an unsuspecting public, scenes such as Mongo’s horse-punching and the campfire farting vignette were considered to be irreverent and outré. In a similar way, in our post-Brooks world, MacFarlane pushes the envelope of our more jaded 2014 sensibilities with scatological humor and jokes in bad taste (and that surely taste badly) that have rarely been seen on the big screen in a major Hollywood production. In terms of standards per onscreen behavior, this is MacFarlane’s Family Guy and American Dad animated TV series on cinematic steroids, raising crudity to the level of high art. (Although A Million Ways to Die in the West holds back when it comes to breasts and female genitalia, which Sarah Silverman as the droll hooker Ruth merely describes, whereas male genitalia is more graphically exposed. Why the shyness, Seth?)
 
As the auteur of A Million Ways to Die in the West (MacFarlane directed, co-wrote and stars -- although, unlike Brooks, he did not punch the holes in the sides of the celluloid), he takes deadly aim at the genre conventions of the Western. Indeed, for our continent’s indigenous peoples, the Westward ho! expansion from sea to not so shining seas was nothing short of a cataclysmic, genocidal catastrophe that is now also turning into an ecological nightmare. Underlying MacFarlane’s critique of the Western lies an awareness of this unadorned history.
 
Like numerous John Ford classics, part of A Million Ways to Die in the West was shot on location in Monument Valley. Mac the Knife satirically deconstructs and debunks cowboy clichés, stressing that in stark contrast to silver screen hagiography, the Wild West was an awful place to find one’s self in. There is an especially delicious joke about the “selfishness” of American Natives, and at the very end (warning -- don’t leave before all the end credits have rolled!) whitey gets his comeuppance for caricaturing newly free slaves at a county fair.
 
Like many a genre spoof A Million Ways to Die in the West walks a fine line in between making fun of the Western’s archetypes and tried and true traits. Sometimes the mockery devolves into becoming the very thing which the iconoclastic artiste has been poking fun at. Such may be the case vis-à-vis the relationship between Albert (MacFarlane) and Anna (Charlize Theron, who may be the horse opera’s most fetching, winsome gunslinger since Jane Fonda rode the purple sage in 1965’s similarly hilarious Cat Ballou, which co-starred Oscar winning Lee Marvin and what is, hoofs down, screendom’s most screamingly funny steed ever).
 
A Million Ways to Die in the West is at its satirical best when it lampoons the mythos of gunslinging. As gunman Clinch Leatherwood, Liam Neeson does a good job of harpooning not only the long-ballyhooed celluloid stereotype of the High Noon-type triggerman, but of the action hero/tough guy roles the actor, who once played Oskar Schindler has been, lamentably, cast in of late. Although it’s hard to assess the psychological impact of and quantify the romanticizing of gunplay in our culture, who knows how many Westerns that pathetic, demented mass murderer in Santa Barbara and others of his shooting spree ilk have seen since birth?
 
MacFarlane’s screen romp is also at its finest when depicting Native Americans, Hollywood’s perennial “noble savages.” A Million Ways to Die in the West portrays them as savage, then as noble -- enlightened heathens who, through psychedelics. lead Albert on an Oz-like trip wherein he attains clarity, if not a taste of enlightenment. Wes Studi -- who played Magua in 1992’s The Last of the Mohicans, the title character in 1992’s Geronimo: An American Legend and the Na'vi chief in 2009’s Avatar -- is, as usual, great, portraying Cochise. For my wampum, Studi steals the show (his niece DeLanna Studi is also a gifted thespian).
 
Neil Patrick Harris also co-stars as Foy, a cross between a city slicker and gunslinger who competes with Albert for the affections of Louise (played by Amanda Seyfried, who, unlike Theron, is not, for some reason, very attractive here). Look for comic Bill Maher in a clever cameo.
 
As for the plot of the movie, it’s very secondary to the boundless laughs for those tickled pink by sheep penises, hats full of excrement and the like. In other words, your humble scribe loved it and recommends it to those for whom this type of rude, crude comedy is their cup of piss -- uh, I mean “tea.” To paraphrase Horace Greeley, it made this reviewer say: “Go Seth, young man!”        

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

Thursday, 9 August 2012

FILM REVIEW: THE BOURNE LEGACY

Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner) in Bourne Legacy.
Our Cross to bear arms

By Ed Rampell

The Bourne Legacy is a highly entertaining, tautly directed movie movie that will have audiences’ tooshes hanging on the edges of their seats during a number of action packed scenes -- especially when Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner) gets all Steve McQueen-y in a nail-biting motorcycle chase sequence.

Now your humble cinema scribe likes being entertained as much as anyone (actually, probably more, given all the time he spends in the dark reviewing movies and more), but to this cultural critic, film is not only an entertainment medium and art form, but also a chronicle of its times. Watching this outrageously ultra-violent flick I couldn’t help but reflect on what an egregiously violent society we live in. Did you notice after that heartbreaking shooting at a screening of The Dark Knight Rises there was nary a peep about the possible relationship between our blood-drenched mass entertainment and the mass killings and other brutality in America?

I mean, there were some murmurs about gun control (although not from our major party presidential candidates, including the coward-in-chief), but the silence was deafening about the correlation between mass entertainment and mass murder. Hmm, could this be because much of the news media is owned by the same fine folks who own the movie studios? Could it be, for example, that Rupert Murdoch, who owns 20th Century Fox as well as Fox News Channel, the New York Post, the Wall Street Journal and apparently endless phone hacking outlets in Britain, etc., doesn’t want a fair and balanced discussion of the possible link between the mentally unbalanced and trigger happy productions? Hmm, inquiring minds want to know.

Now, I realize that 2008’s The Dark Knight was a motion picture parable about the so-called “War on Terror”, and I wrote about that at the time. Similarly, The Bourne Legacy certainly makes scathing points about contemporary America: Drone warfare; high level intricate intelligence conspiracies; government secrecy; big pharma; military experiments gone awry.

Okay, the filmmakers may have intended social criticism of the powers that be, but be that as it may, mentally unstable people may only perceive the aggression and viciousness inherent in movies like the Bourne flicks, and not be able to grasp their political nuances. And the movie’s Third World sequences show an utter lack of regard for the lives of Filipinos, giving new meaning to the title of John Ford’s 1945 Philippines-set They Were Expendable. Once again, Third World people only serve as exotic background to advance the plot points of the really important Caucasian characters.

The vicious circle and cinema cycle seems to be: A warlike society that endlessly invades, bombs, bullies other countries (and lest we forget, its own oppressed peoples) requires an aggressive populace to fight its dirty wars and also spawns a blood soaked culture, which in turn generates more belligerent individuals, who have easy access to weapons of mass murder, and round and round and on and on we go, traipsing towards Judgment Day.